Corporate & Technology Law
Founders' Agreements
Drafting and review of founders' agreements for early-stage and startup co-founders in India — equity split, vesting, roles, intellectual property, and what happens if a founder leaves, settled before the company gets complicated.
Indian Contract Act, 1872 | Equity · Vesting · IP | Co-Founders · Early-Stage Ventures
What a Founders' Agreement Actually Does
Most ventures begin with a conversation between people who trust each other. A founders' agreement is what turns that conversation into something durable — a written contract among the co-founders that records the terms they are actually relying on, before the pressure of building a company tests their memory of them.
It answers the questions founders tend to leave implicit at the start: how is the equity divided, and is it earned over time or owned outright from day one? What is each founder responsible for, and how much time are they committing? Who decides when the founders disagree? And — the question that causes the most damage when left unanswered — what happens to a founder's shares if they leave?
Where the founders have already incorporated a company, the agreement sits alongside the company's constitution — its memorandum and articles of association — and the terms that need to bind the company are carried into those documents or into a later shareholders' agreement. A founders' agreement is, in effect, the first layer of governance a venture puts down, written while the founders still agree on everything.
Who Needs One, and When
Any venture with more than one founder benefits from a founders' agreement — and the smaller and earlier the venture, the more it has to gain, because there is the most still unwritten.
The right time to put one in place is at the very start: at or just before incorporation, and certainly before the venture has built anything of value or taken in any outside money. Two moments make it urgent:
- Before significant work is created. The code, designs, content, and brand a company is built on are intellectual property, and unless it is assigned to the company, it may belong to the individual who made it. An agreement settles ownership before that work exists.
- Before money comes in — from anyone. Once a founder has put in capital, or a first cheque arrives from outside, the cost of an unclear arrangement rises sharply.
Founders sometimes delay an agreement because raising it feels like distrust. In practice it is the opposite: it is the conversation that protects the relationship, by deciding the hard questions while everyone is still aligned and nothing is yet at stake.
What the Agreement Typically Covers
The terms follow the venture, but most founders' agreements cover the same ground. Each clause exists to answer a question that, left open, tends to surface at the worst possible time.
Equity split and ownership
The agreement records how the venture's ownership is divided among the founders, and on what basis. It is worth being explicit about the reasoning — contribution, role, capital, or idea — because an equity split that is never explained is the one most often resented later.
Vesting and the cliff
Rather than each founder owning their full stake from day one, vesting lets founders earn their equity over time — commonly over four years, with a one-year "cliff" before any of it is earned. If a founder leaves early, the unearned portion returns to the company or the other founders on agreed terms. Vesting is the single most effective protection against the most common founder problem: a co-founder who departs in the first year but keeps a large block of shares.
Roles, responsibilities and commitment
The agreement sets out what each founder will do, the seniority or title attached, and the time commitment expected — full-time, part-time, or transitioning. Clarity here prevents the slow resentment that builds when one founder feels another is not carrying their share.
Decision-making
It records how the founders make decisions — which decisions need unanimity, which follow a majority, and how a tie is broken — so that disagreement does not become deadlock.
Intellectual-property assignment
This is among the most important terms and the most often overlooked. Work created by a founder — software, designs, written material, the brand — does not automatically belong to the company merely because the founder is involved in it. The agreement assigns that intellectual property to the company, so the venture, and not an individual, owns what it is built on. Investors and acquirers examine this closely; an unassigned founder's IP can stall a funding round or a sale.
Leaver provisions
The agreement sets out what happens when a founder leaves — including the distinction between a "good leaver" and a "bad leaver", which can affect how much of their equity they keep and the terms on which the rest is bought back. This is the machinery that makes vesting work in practice.
Founder contributions and expenses
Where founders put in capital, equipment, or pay early costs personally, the agreement records what was contributed and how it is treated — as equity, as a loan, or as a reimbursable expense — so that early generosity is not later disputed.
Confidentiality, non-compete and dispute resolution
Most agreements bind the founders to keep the venture's affairs confidential, restrain a departing founder from competing for an agreed period, and specify how disputes are resolved — usually by arbitration, which keeps a founder disagreement private.
Founders' Agreement vs Shareholders' Agreement
The two are often confused, and the difference is mainly one of stage and scope. A founders' agreement is the early document among the founders themselves, focused on the founding relationship — equity, vesting, roles, and IP. A shareholders' agreement is the broader instrument that governs all the company's shareholders, including investors, and covers wider matters of control, reserved decisions, transfer restrictions, and exit.
In a typical path, founders sign a founders' agreement at the start, and when outside investment arrives, the investor requires a full shareholders' agreement that absorbs and supersedes much of it. A well-drafted founders' agreement is built with that future in mind — so that when the venture raises, its founding terms fold cleanly into the larger agreement rather than having to be unpicked and renegotiated.
The two are complementary, not alternatives: the founders' agreement governs the beginning, and the shareholders' agreement governs the company once ownership widens.
What Goes Wrong Without One
The absence of a founders' agreement is rarely felt until something changes — and by then it is expensive to fix:
- A co-founder leaves in the first months holding a third of the company, because there was no vesting — leaving the remaining founders building value for someone who walked away.
- The venture discovers, often during due diligence for a funding round, that key intellectual property belongs to an individual founder rather than the company, because it was never assigned.
- The founders deadlock on a fundamental decision with no agreed way to break it, and the venture stalls.
- Roles and expectations were never set, and a founder who under-contributes cannot be addressed because nothing defined what they owed.
Each of these is foreseeable at the start and difficult to repair later. A founders' agreement is the inexpensive, early conversation that prevents the expensive, late dispute.
How Luke & Luka Approaches a Founders' Agreement
The firm drafts and reviews founders' agreements with the venture's next stage already in view:
- Drafting from scratch — for founders setting up a venture, building the agreement around the actual understanding between them and aligning it with the company's incorporation documents.
- Reviewing a draft or a template — founders often start from an online template; the review identifies what it leaves out, what does not fit Indian company law, and where the founders are exposed.
- Preparing for investment — structuring the agreement so that vesting, intellectual property, and leaver terms carry cleanly into a future shareholders' agreement when the venture raises.
In each case the aim is the same: to settle the founding terms clearly while the founders still agree, in a document that holds when the venture grows and is tested. Subject to the applicable law and the specific facts, the agreement is drafted to reflect the founders' actual intentions and to fit the company's constitution — not a generic template.